patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Advocacy Group Criticizes Haley's Recent Port Decision in New TV Ad

The ads will be broadcast statewide during and around the Clemson-South Carolina game on Saturday.

 

Conservatives for Truth In Politics has bought television time statewide to broadcast a new ad that criticizes Gov. Nikki Haley's recent port decision.

The South Carolina advocacy group said the advertisement will expose the "backroom deal" with officials from the Savannah Port.

“Governor Haley’s actions are both bizarre and unexplainable. It’s an attack on South Carolina’s economy and our workers," said Conservatives for Truth In Politics Executive Director Liana Orr.

"Haley needs to come clean about her dealings with Savannah Port officials as well as other Georgia elected officials," Orr said. "South Carolinians expect their Governor to fight to protect jobs in South Carolina, not send them to Georgia."

Rep. Leon Stavrinakis (D-Charleston) on Wednesday released the following statement about Haley and the DHEC Board's decision on the Savannah River.

"Today’s news that Gov. Haley had a secret fund raiser in the state of Georgia just days before she and her DHEC Board sold out the Port of Chalreston, the SC environment and the SC economy is an outrage. That this fund raiser was put together by a board member of the Georgia State Chamber of Commerce and the Atlanta Metro Chamber of Commerce, and held at a law firm engaged in port related legal work is even more troubling. Governor Haley needs to come clean immediately on all of her Georgia dealings.”

Last month, Haley’s appointees on the DHEC board reversed their longtime position against allowing dredging in waters around the South Carolina/Georgia border which would allow large container ships access to the Savannah port.

Members of the Savannah River Maritime Commission voted on Nov. 14 to take legal action against the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control for issuing a permit allowing the Georgia Ports Authority to deepen the Savannah River leading to the Port of Savannah.

Haley could not be reached for comment on Wednesday, but at a meeting at the Propeller Club in Charleston a few weeks ago, Haley defended her position.

TIP said the ads will begin running during and around the South Carolina-Clemson football game and will continue into the next week. The ads will air on both cable and network television.

Related Topics: Gov. Nikki Haley, Port of Charleston, Port of Savannah, and S.C. DHEC

Jay Bennett

2:00 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Sayyyy; who is funding this group and is ads; must be the DNC.

Reply
Comment_arrow

TwoNotch

2:52 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Sayyyy, Who is Jay Bennet? Who's funding You? How you get the time to email if your in bed with trickie nickie?

stanley seigler

4:14 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

re: Governor Haley’s actions are both bizarre and unexplainable. It’s an attack on South Carolina’s economy and our workers...

the gov's attack on SC workers seems more egregious than the NLRB's (boeing case)...hard to tell who your friends are these days...any help in understanding appreciated...

Reply
Comment_arrow

TwoNotch

8:16 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Well Stanley, the major issue is her quest for higher power (or maybe she thinks she's the HIGHER POWER) She's is getting $$$ from outside the state in exchange for selling out the state in order to build Why all these $$$ from big corps and politicans in other states flowing into her campaign fund? Why is she OUT OF STATE to raise they money on our "Dime"? She is paid to be a Gov-not take fund raising trips every week. This is really worst than Sanford-at least he followed his heart-This woman follows the $$$ when she goes out of town. What in the H#** do you, I, or the other citizens of any state have reason to care about or contribute to the election of some other states leaders???? They people are donating to later be able to exert influence (LOBBY) our Gov to work in thier favor. IE the PORT DEAL. This is pay for play BIG TIME right under our noses. Will it change???? No, South Carolinain's see a RED "R" and that's all it takes. I was transferred here to SC years ago and now that I've retired I'm getting out and letting the FOOLS follow the Shepperd-that is Shepperd with a BIG RED "R"!!!!

stanley seigler

10:14 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011

@TwoNotch
THANKS...if what you say is true...she is not only a hypocritical christian...she violate all the tenets of her parent's religion...sikhism.

BTW with all the questions re BO muslim background...why has the sikh background of SC gov not been an issue...believe she still attends sikh services

full disclosure opine: not religious, but christianity, judaism, muslim and sikh, etcetc, religions are "spokes on the same wheel" (maybe gandhi said).

BTW2 if i became a believer...may attend sikh services.

Reply

Joe

7:29 am on Thursday, November 24, 2011

What is wrong with deepening the port?

Reply
Comment_arrow

ReadIt

10:16 am on Thursday, November 24, 2011

She's deepening the wrong one. Our legislators in DC have been fighting, along with the citizens of SC to get the Charleston Port deepened as soon as possible so that our port can handle larger container ships starting in I believe 2014/5. Not only would deepening the port create jobs for the project, but it would allow companies who utilize the Charleston port to continue to do so, and also allow new companies to do the same. This is assuming though that they don't take their business to Savannah instead of SC because of Haley.

I was with Lindsey Graham earlier this year and although I tend to disagree with some of his policies, he was dead on about this one - (paraphrasing) "Deepening the port of Charleston is THE most important economic issue and opportunity for South Carolina".

She's turned her back on SC with this one - yet another reason she needs to get out of office.

Joe

12:36 pm on Thursday, November 24, 2011

Please stop! Maybe she had to make a deal to get Charleston done! Grahm, what a joke! So you want her out of office for this? You obviously have another agenda. Grahm is the 1 who has 2 go!

Reply
Comment_arrow

ReadIt

9:10 pm on Thursday, November 24, 2011

I want her out of office for many reasons, which are pointless to layout in a website comment box. I agree Graham needs to leave too - but he's statement on the port of Charleston was dead on. When I lived there for a good number of years, that port was the driving force for a lot of companies in the state and the rest of the region. If there's another deal she's made then I'd wish she'd let us know, because SC will lose a lot of business if Savannah's port gets deepened first or if Savannah's port is deepened and Charleston's never is.

Joe

7:57 am on Friday, November 25, 2011

Trust me Charleston will be deepened. But give me ONE reason she needs to go, and I am no fan just curious.

Reply

George Grace

10:23 am on Friday, November 25, 2011

Clark is right to say we should listen to Ron Paul. In a Republican presidential debate on 5/15/07, Paul stated clearly that we were attacked on 9/11 as blowback from our foreign policy. Indeed, The 9/11 Commission Report (page 147) reports that 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed said he hates us because of our biased support for Israel, which is in violation of international law and UN Security Council resolutions because of its illegal brutal occupations. Because of 9/11 we blundered into the ill-conceived invasion of Afghanistan. Following this, the Israel Lobby neocons fixed the intelligence to lie us into war with Iraq on behalf of Israel. Iran is next on their agenda.

Reply

George Grace

10:23 am on Friday, November 25, 2011

In the 8/11/11 debate, Paul stated that we should stop spending trillions on all these unnecessary wars. We’re going bankrupt. Like Iraq, Iran is no threat to us. Paul pointed out that the CIA has said there is no evidence that Iran is making a nuclear bomb, and he noted that the current anti-Iranian propaganda is just like the mendacious pro-war propaganda which led us into the unnecessary war with Iraq. Paul reiterated at the debate 9/12/11 that we are under attack out of revenge for our foreign policy. “We are there occupying their land. What would we do if China did to us what we do to those countries over there?” “The idea that the whole Muslim world is attacking us because we are free and prosperous is not true.” “They [al Qaeda] have more attacks against us and the American interests per month than occurred in all the years before 9/11.” He noted that Al Qaeda’s original complaints against us were due to 1. Our bases in their holy lands in Saudi Arabia; 2. Lack of fairness to the Palestinians; 3. “We had been bombing and killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqis for 10 years. Would you be annoyed? If you’re not, then there’s some problem.”

Reply

George Grace

10:24 am on Friday, November 25, 2011

On NBC Meet the Press 10/23/11, Ron Paul again condemned our counterproductive foreign policy. For instance, our drone attacks all over the place, which kill civilians, serve to inspire anti-US hatred. He asked would we not be upset if say China did that to us! He noted that we have morphed the military and private sector. The combination of CIA and contractors in the armed fortress we call our embassy in Iraq, the largest embassy in the world, is viewed as a continuing occupation. In other words, the troops aren’t coming home, we just changed their names. Furthermore, with 300 nukes, Israel is in no danger of an Iranian invasion. He noted that during the 60’s we faced 30,000 nukes in the USSR, but we survived without ever going to war with them.
At the 10/18/11 debate Paul correctly pointed out that our empire is spread too thin and overextended and that our biggest danger is the ballooning debt. He said we have 900 bases in 150 countries and like the USSR, which collapsed after going broke from their Afghanistan occupation, we're committing economic suicide. When discussing our lack of border security with Mexico, Paul criticized our spending resources on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border when we can't even protect our own. We’re headed for financial calamity.
Ron Paul 11/6/11 on Fox News Sunday told Chris Wallace that having too many troops around the world hurts our national defense and helps bankrupt our country.

Reply

George Grace

10:24 am on Friday, November 25, 2011

He opposes all these illegal, unconstitutional, and undeclared wars we’ve been fighting. In the past 10 years, these foreign expenditures have contributed $4 trillion to our national debt.

Reply

George Grace

10:29 am on Friday, November 25, 2011

This is my post - not Ron Paul's -------
Col (Ret) Tom Wilkinson said it best. We can project power faster and better off our carriers and air force, including move troops from the USA, than from fixed bases around the world.

Close most of the overseas bases; Pacific leave Okinawa and South Korea open. In Europe leave Mildenhall, England; Rota, Spain; Ramstein, Germany and Aviano, Italy open.

Close the rest. Why do we need bases in Crete, Sicily and Naples? Just inertia and a far greater Defense Dept budget than we need or can afford.

Retire all military with 25 years service or more. Promote younger people. No lay-offs, firings or buy-outs. Just send them home with thanks and a pension.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1111/69060.html#ixzz1ejOkEYh6

Reply

stanley seigler

10:48 am on Friday, November 25, 2011

@ReadIt "...if Savannah's port gets deepened first or if Savannah's port is deepened and Charleston's never is."

dont have a horse in this race...and it's good for the area regardless which port is deepened first or only...but;

it was definitely NOT in charleston area's interest to go for savannah area first...which should have been the gov's primary interest...and have yet to hear a reasonable explanation...just the usual spin crap.

Reply

Joe

11:03 am on Friday, November 25, 2011

Savannah is the 2nd busiest port for exports in America that's whY!

Reply

stanley seigler

11:07 am on Friday, November 25, 2011

@geo grace: " He [paul] opposes all these illegal, unconstitutional, and undeclared wars we’ve been fighting. In the past 10 years, these foreign expenditures have contributed $4 trillion to our national debt."...etcetc...

dont agree with most of paul's proposed policies...they will only work in a society where there are no bad guys (just honest injuns) and all work for the common good...not party/self good.

but paul's evaluation of the military industrial complex (MIC) is spot on in my opinion...BTW;

didnt IKE warn us of the MIC...and didn't we learn anything after being lied (bay of tonkin) into the vietnam war...when will we ever learn...perhaps we never will, vincent...

"They would not listen, they're not listening still.
Perhaps they [we] never will..."

Reply

George Grace

2:42 pm on Friday, November 25, 2011

We haven't declared war on anyone since Dec 1941. I think it's because no one in Congress has the "cojones" to go on record. They'll just vote appropriations and say they're supporting the troops. Sad!

Reply

Leave a comment